| Title |
Observational learning of tool-use by young chimpanzees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Evolution, April 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02436405 |
| Authors |
M. Tomasello, M. Davis-Dasilva, L. Camak, K. Bard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 26% |
| Psychology | 39 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,409,591
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Human Evolution
#39
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,279
of 11,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Evolution
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.