| Title |
Preventive disaster management of extreme natural events
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-006-9075-0 |
| Authors |
Alik Ismail-Zadeh, Kuniyoshi Takeuchi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 20% |
| Engineering | 11 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2015.
All research outputs
#3,032,455
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#351
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,595
of 76,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.