↓ Skip to main content

Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Local Support for Black Bear Recovery Strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Local Support for Black Bear Recovery Strategies
Published in
Environmental Management, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00267-010-9485-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita T. Morzillo, Angela G. Mertig, Jeffrey W. Hollister, Nathan Garner, Jianguo Liu

Abstract

There is global interest in recovering locally extirpated carnivore species. Successful efforts to recover Louisiana black bear in Louisiana have prompted interest in recovery throughout the species' historical range. We evaluated support for three potential black bear recovery strategies prior to public release of a black bear conservation and management plan for eastern Texas, United States. Data were collected from 1,006 residents living in proximity to potential recovery locations, particularly Big Thicket National Preserve. In addition to traditional logistic regression analysis, we used conditional probability analysis to statistically and visually evaluate probabilities of public support for potential black bear recovery strategies based on socioeconomic characteristics. Allowing black bears to repopulate the region on their own (i.e., without active reintroduction) was the recovery strategy with the greatest probability of acceptance. Recovery strategy acceptance was influenced by many socioeconomic factors. Older and long-time local residents were most likely to want to exclude black bears from the area. Concern about the problems that black bears may cause was the only variable significantly related to support or non-support across all strategies. Lack of personal knowledge about black bears was the most frequent reason for uncertainty about preferred strategy. In order to reduce local uncertainty about possible recovery strategies, we suggest that wildlife managers focus outreach efforts on providing local residents with general information about black bears, as well as information pertinent to minimizing the potential for human-black bear conflict.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
United States 2 1%
India 2 1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 150 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 21%
Researcher 31 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 16%
Other 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 19 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 51%
Environmental Science 38 23%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 22 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2010.
All research outputs
#6,528,938
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#540
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,174
of 102,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.