| Title |
Olfactory bulb changes in Alzheimer's disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, December 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00688261 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. G. Ohm, H. Braak |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Professor | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 1999.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,519
of 2,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,530
of 49,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.