| Title |
Conversion of ethylene diamine dihydrochloride into ethylenediamine by electrodialytic water-splitting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, November 1979
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00614967 |
| Authors |
Y. Chang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 67% |
| Other | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 1999.
All research outputs
#7,558,494
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Electrochemistry
#188
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,672
of 7,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Electrochemistry
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.