↓ Skip to main content

The role of intestinal microbiota in the pathogenesis of NAFLD: starting points for intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Medical Science, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of intestinal microbiota in the pathogenesis of NAFLD: starting points for intervention
Published in
Archives of Medical Science, March 2016
DOI 10.5114/aoms.2016.58831
Pubmed ID
Authors

Umberto Vespasiani-Gentilucci, Paolo Gallo, Antonio Picardi

Abstract

In recent years, close links between intestinal microbiota and host metabolism have been recognized. Intestinal bacteria can participate in the extraction of calories from food, and circulation of bacterial products, in particular lipopolysaccharides (LPS), is responsible for the "metabolic endotoxemia", which contributes to insulin resistance and its complications, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Indeed, qualitative and quantitative intestinal dysbiotic changes have been clearly documented in NAFLD patients, and several mechanisms by which the intestinal microbiota can directly promote liver fat deposition, inflammation and fibrosis have also been described. Consistently, although with some differences concerning type and proportion of results, experimental and clinical studies are quite concordant in demonstrating beneficial effects of probiotic and/or prebiotic therapy in NAFLD. Although some physiopathological bases have been produced, major doubts still remain concerning how and when to intervene. Indeed, most of the available works were performed with mixtures of probiotics and/or prebiotics, and a baseline assessment of dysbiosis aimed at selecting the best candidates for treatment and predicting response has not been performed in any of the clinical studies in NAFLD. While future research is expected to solve these issues, the particularly favorable safety profile suggests that probiotic/prebiotic therapy could already be "tested" in NAFLD patients on an individual basis, at least once all the measures recommended by the latest guidelines have failed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 19 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 22 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2018.
All research outputs
#19,947,956
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Medical Science
#881
of 1,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,585
of 314,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Medical Science
#39
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,760 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.