| Title |
Enzymatic synthesis of (R) and (S) 1-deuterohexanol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, April 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02922180 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Curt W. Bradshaw, James J. Lalonde, Chi-Huey Wong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 33% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 2 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 22% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,558,494
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#544
of 2,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,540
of 19,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.