| Title |
Ribosome defects in disorders of erythropoiesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Hematology, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12185-011-0776-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anupama Narla, Slater N. Hurst, Benjamin L. Ebert |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 21% |
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,462,180
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#255
of 1,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,339
of 182,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,393 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.