↓ Skip to main content

Developmental changes in plasmodesmata in transgenic tobacco expressing the movement protein of tobacco mosaic virus

Overview of attention for article published in Protoplasma, September 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Developmental changes in plasmodesmata in transgenic tobacco expressing the movement protein of tobacco mosaic virus
Published in
Protoplasma, September 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01378787
Authors

Patricia J. Moore, Csilla A. Fenczik, C. M. Deom, R. N. Beachy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Researcher 3 17%
Professor 3 17%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 22%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 1999.
All research outputs
#7,558,494
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#136
of 981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,275
of 18,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 981 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them