↓ Skip to main content

Imaging features of musculoskeletal tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Imaging features of musculoskeletal tuberculosis
Published in
European Radiology, August 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00330-002-1609-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitri De Vuyst, Filip Vanhoenacker, Jan Gielen, Anja Bernaerts, Arthur M. De Schepper

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review the imaging characteristics of musculoskeletal tuberculosis. Skeletal tuberculosis represents one-third of all cases of tuberculosis occurring in extrapulmonary sites. Hematogenous spread from a distant focus elsewhere in the body is the cornerstone in the understanding of imaging features of musculoskeletal tuberculosis. The most common presentations are tuberculous spondylitis, arthritis, osteomyelitis, and soft tissue involvement. The diagnostic value of the different imaging techniques, which include conventional radiography, CT, and MR imaging, are emphasized. Whereas conventional radiography is the mainstay in the diagnosis of tuberculous arthritis and osteomyelitis, MR imaging may detect associated bone marrow and soft tissue abnormalities. MR imaging is generally accepted as the imaging modality of choice for diagnosis, demonstration of the extent of the disease of tuberculous spondylitis, and soft tissue tuberculosis. Moreover, it may be very helpful in the differential diagnosis with pyogenic spondylodiscitis, as it may easily demonstrate anterior corner destruction, the relative preservation of the intervertebral disk, multilevel involvement with or without skip lesions, and a large soft tissue abscess, as these are all arguments in favor of a tuberculous spondylitis. On the other hand, CT is still superior in the demonstration of calcifications, which are found in chronic tuberculous abscesses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 18%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 22 25%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 59%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Unspecified 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,360
of 4,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,698
of 48,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.