Title |
Cutaneous responses to topical methyl nicotinate in black, oriental, and caucasian subjects
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Dermatological Research, April 1989
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00426585 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. J. Gean, E. Tur, H. I. Maibach, R. H. Guy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 15% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
Librarian | 1 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 23% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 23% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 1999.
All research outputs
#4,765,602
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Dermatological Research
#164
of 1,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,628
of 14,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Dermatological Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,332 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them