| Title |
Richness, Abundance, and Complementarity of Fruit-feeding Butterfly Species in Relict Sacred Forests and Forest Reserves of Ghana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-005-2574-6 |
| Authors |
J. L. Bossart, E. Opuni-Frimpong, S. Kuudaar, E. Nkrumah |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 139 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 24% |
| Researcher | 33 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 39 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,284,317
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#170
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,249
of 158,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.