↓ Skip to main content

Issues related to mineralized tissue biology in human evolutionary research

Overview of attention for article published in Human Evolution, April 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 104)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Issues related to mineralized tissue biology in human evolutionary research
Published in
Human Evolution, April 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf02435617
Authors

T. G. Bromage

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 60%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,746,777
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Human Evolution
#40
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,179
of 18,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Evolution
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them