↓ Skip to main content

Tool path generation for machining free-form pockets using Voronoi diagrams

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, December 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Tool path generation for machining free-form pockets using Voronoi diagrams
Published in
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, December 1998
DOI 10.1007/bf01179076
Authors

J. Jeong, K. Kim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 67%
Chemistry 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,965,094
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
#80
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,388
of 102,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them