↓ Skip to main content

Image Gently: progress and challenges in CT education and advocacy

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Image Gently: progress and challenges in CT education and advocacy
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00247-011-2133-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marilyn J. Goske, Kimberly E. Applegate, Dorothy Bulas, Priscilla F. Butler, Michael J. Callahan, Brian D. Coley, Steven Don, Donald P. Frush, Marta Hernanz-Schulman, Sue C. Kaste, Gregory Morrison, Manrita Sidhu, Keith J. Strauss, S. Ted Treves, on behalf of the Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging

Abstract

Significant progress has been made in radiation protection for children during the last 10 years. This includes increased awareness of the need for radiation protection for pediatric patients with international partnerships through the Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging. This paper identifies five areas of significant progress in radiation safety for children: the growth of the Alliance; the development of an adult radiation protection campaign Image Wisely™; increased collaboration with government agencies, societies and the vendor community; the development of national guidelines in pediatric nuclear medicine, and the development of a size-based patient dose correction factor by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Task Group 204. However, many challenges remain. These include the need for continued education and change of practice at adult-focused hospitals where many pediatric CT exams are performed; the need for increased emphasis on appropriateness of pediatric imaging and outcomes research to validate the performance of CT studies, and the advancement of the work of the first pediatric national dose registry to determine the "state of the practice" with the final goal of establishing ranges of optimal CT technique for specific scan indications when imaging children with CT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 44%
Engineering 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,237,301
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#1,317
of 2,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,436
of 123,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,069 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.