↓ Skip to main content

Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features

Overview of attention for article published in Psychometrika, March 1977
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
13 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
765 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features
Published in
Psychometrika, March 1977
DOI 10.1007/bf02293745
Authors

Yoshio Takane, Forrest W. Young, Jan de Leeuw

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 5%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 148 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 25%
Researcher 34 20%
Student > Master 20 12%
Professor 17 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 9%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 15 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 12%
Computer Science 21 12%
Engineering 16 9%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Other 43 25%
Unknown 24 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,558,494
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Psychometrika
#144
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,215
of 5,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychometrika
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them