↓ Skip to main content

Glutamine, arginine, and leucine signaling in the intestine

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
280 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
Glutamine, arginine, and leucine signaling in the intestine
Published in
Amino Acids, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00726-008-0225-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Marc Rhoads, Guoyao Wu

Abstract

Glutamine and leucine are abundant constituents of plant and animal proteins, whereas the content of arginine in foods and physiological fluids varies greatly. Besides their role in protein synthesis, these three amino acids individually activate signaling pathway to promote protein synthesis and possibly inhibit autophagy-mediated protein degradation in intestinal epithelial cells. In addition, glutamine and arginine stimulate the mitogen-activated protein kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)/p70 (s6) kinase pathways, respectively, to enhance mucosal cell migration and restitution. Moreover, through the nitric oxide-dependent cGMP signaling cascade, arginine regulates multiple physiological events in the intestine that are beneficial for cell homeostasis and survival. Available evidence from both in vitro and in vivo animal studies shows that glutamine and arginine promote cell proliferation and exert differential cytoprotective effects in response to nutrient deprivation, oxidative injury, stress, and immunological challenge. Additionally, when nitric oxide is available, leucine increases the migration of intestinal cells. Therefore, through cellular signaling mechanisms, arginine, glutamine, and leucine play crucial roles in intestinal growth, integrity, and function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 180 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 35 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 41 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,006,237
of 25,006,193 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#238
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,156
of 184,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,006,193 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.