↓ Skip to main content

Solid phase synthesis of the fibronectin glycopeptide V(Galβ3GalNAcα)THPGY, its β analogue, and the corresponding unglycosylated peptide

Overview of attention for article published in Glycoconjugate Journal, December 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Solid phase synthesis of the fibronectin glycopeptide V(Galβ3GalNAcα)THPGY, its β analogue, and the corresponding unglycosylated peptide
Published in
Glycoconjugate Journal, December 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00769846
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Lüning, T. Norberg, C. Rivera-Baeza, J. Tejbrant

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Glycoconjugate Journal
#292
of 929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,389
of 61,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Glycoconjugate Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 929 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them