Title |
Earle's balanced salt solution: Preparation of the saline
|
---|---|
Published in |
Methods in Cell Science, December 1975
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00916996 |
Authors |
Jay C. Bryant |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 40% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
Researcher | 3 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 50% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 10% |
Engineering | 2 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#153
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,268
of 22,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them