↓ Skip to main content

Opioid Overdose Deaths in the City and County of San Francisco: Prevalence, Distribution, and Disparities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Opioid Overdose Deaths in the City and County of San Francisco: Prevalence, Distribution, and Disparities
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11524-015-9967-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam J Visconti, Glenn-Milo Santos, Nikolas P. Lemos, Catherine Burke, Phillip O Coffin

Abstract

Drug overdose is now the leading cause of unintentional death nationwide, driven by increased prescription opioid overdoses. To better understand urban opioid overdose deaths, this paper examines geographic, demographic, and clinical differences between heroin-related decedents and prescription opioid decedents in San Francisco from 2010 to 2012. During this time period, 331 individuals died from accidental overdose caused by opioids (310 involving prescription opioids and 31 involving heroin). Deaths most commonly involved methadone (45.9 %), morphine (26.9 %), and oxycodone (21.8 %). Most deaths also involved other substances (74.9 %), most commonly cocaine (35.3 %), benzodiazepines (27.5 %), antidepressants (22.7 %), and alcohol (19.6 %). Deaths were concentrated in a small, high-poverty, central area of San Francisco and disproportionately affected African-American individuals. Decedents in high-poverty areas were significantly more likely to die from methadone and cocaine, whereas individuals from more affluent areas were more likely die from oxycodone and benzodiazepines. Heroin decedents were more likely to be within a younger age demographic, die in public spaces, and have illicit substances rather than other prescription opioids. Overall, heroin overdose death, previously common in San Francisco, is now rare. Prescription opioid overdose has emerged as a significant concern, particularly among individuals in high-poverty areas. Deaths in poor and affluent regions involve different causative opioids and co-occurring substances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 11%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 31 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 29 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 41 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,208,710
of 24,380,741 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#178
of 1,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,732
of 243,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,380,741 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them