| Title |
Throughput of selective-repeat ARQ with time diversity in Markov channels with unreliable feedback
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wireless Networks, March 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01201462 |
| Authors |
Michele Zorzi, Ramesh R. Rao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 60% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 80% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2008.
All research outputs
#7,558,767
of 23,057,470 outputs
Outputs from Wireless Networks
#100
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,267
of 26,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wireless Networks
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,057,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them