| Title |
Urolithiasis and phytotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, September 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02767650 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. Grases, G. Melero, A. Costa-Bauzá, R. Prieto, J. G. March |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 22% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,867,849
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#121
of 1,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,319
of 20,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,507 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them