↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of GOLDEN2-LIKE gene function in C3 and C4 plants

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of GOLDEN2-LIKE gene function in C3 and C4 plants
Published in
Planta, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00425-012-1754-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peng Wang, Jim Fouracre, Steven Kelly, Shanta Karki, Udo Gowik, Sylvain Aubry, Michael K. Shaw, Peter Westhoff, Inez H. Slamet-Loedin, W. Paul Quick, Julian M. Hibberd, Jane A. Langdale

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Moldova, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 155 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Student > Master 8 5%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 14%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 34 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,956,978
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#552
of 2,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,245
of 168,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,718 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.