↓ Skip to main content

Prion-like properties of disease-relevant proteins in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neural Transmission, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Prion-like properties of disease-relevant proteins in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00702-018-1851-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Bräuer, V. Zimyanin, A. Hermann

Abstract

The hallmark of age-related neurodegenerative diseases is the appearance of cellular protein deposits and spreading of this pathology throughout the central nervous system. Growing evidence has shown the involvement and critical role of proteins with prion-like properties in the formation of these characteristic cellular aggregates. Prion-like domains of such proteins with their proposed function in the organization of membraneless organelles are prone for misfolding and promoting further aggregation. Spreading of these toxic aggregates between cells and across tissues can explain the progression of clinical phenotypes and pathology in a stereotypical manner, characteristic for almost every neurodegenerative disease. Here, we want to review the current evidence for the role of prion-like mechanisms in classical neurodegenerative diseases and ALS in particular. We will also discuss an intriguingly central role of the protein TDP-43 in the majority of cases of this devastating disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 34%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 27%
Neuroscience 16 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Chemistry 4 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,725,551
of 23,057,470 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neural Transmission
#128
of 1,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,778
of 439,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neural Transmission
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,057,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.