| Title |
A note on baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) in Kordofan, Sudan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10722-013-9964-5 |
| Authors |
J. Gebauer, E. Luedeling |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Benin | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,462,180
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#273
of 717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,514
of 193,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them