↓ Skip to main content

Preparation of ultrafine Fe-Si-C powders in a radio-frequency thermal plasma and their catalytic properties

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, February 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Preparation of ultrafine Fe-Si-C powders in a radio-frequency thermal plasma and their catalytic properties
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, February 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00414251
Authors

T. Kameyama, K. Sakanaka, H. Arakawa, A. Motoe, T. Tsunoda, K. Fukuda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 50%
Chemistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2008.
All research outputs
#7,558,767
of 23,057,470 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#940
of 4,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,963
of 71,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#16
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,057,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.