Title |
Molecular cloning, sequence analysis and elicitor-/ozone-induced accumulation of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase from Norway spruce (Picea abies L.)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Molecular Biology, October 1993
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00021427 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hélène Galliano, Mireille Cabané, Christoph Eckerskorn, Friedrich Lottspeich, Heinrich Sandermann, Dieter Ernst |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 4 | 22% |
Researcher | 4 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 78% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2008.
All research outputs
#7,558,767
of 23,057,470 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#983
of 2,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,948
of 20,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#30
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,057,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.