↓ Skip to main content

Resistance exercise improves muscle strength, health status and pain intensity in fibromyalgia—a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 3,408)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
113 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
716 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resistance exercise improves muscle strength, health status and pain intensity in fibromyalgia—a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13075-015-0679-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anette Larsson, Annie Palstam, Monika Löfgren, Malin Ernberg, Jan Bjersing, Indre Bileviciute-Ljungar, Björn Gerdle, Eva Kosek, Kaisa Mannerkorpi

Abstract

Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by persistent widespread pain, increased pain sensitivity and tenderness. Muscle strength in women with FM is reduced compared to healthy women. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of a progressive resistance exercise program on muscle strength, health status, and current pain intensity in women with FM. A total of 130 women with FM (age 22-64 years, symptom duration 0-35 years) were included in this assessor-blinded randomized controlled multi-center trial examining the effects of progressive resistance group exercise compared with an active control group. A person-centred model of exercise was used to support the participants' self-confidence for management of exercise because of known risks of activity-induced pain in FM. The intervention was performed twice a week for 15 weeks and was supervised by experienced physiotherapists. Primary outcome measure was isometric knee-extension force (Steve Strong®), secondary outcome measures were health status (FIQ total score), current pain intensity (VAS), 6MWT, isometric elbow-flexion force, hand-grip force, health related quality of life, pain disability, pain acceptance, fear avoidance beliefs, and patient global impression of change (PGIC). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and immediately after the intervention. Long-term follow up comprised the self-reported questionnaires only and was conducted after 13-18 months. Between-group and within-group differences were calculated using non-parametric statistics. Significant improvements were found for isometric knee-extension force (p = 0.010), health status (p = 0.038), current pain intensity (p = 0.033), 6MWT (p = 0.003), isometric elbow flexion force (p = 0.02), pain disability (p = 0.005), and pain acceptance (p = 0.043) in the resistance exercise group (n = 56) when compared to the control group (n = 49). PGIC differed significantly (p = 0.001) in favor of the resistance exercise group at post-treatment examinations. No significant differences between the resistance exercise group and the active control group were found regarding change in self-reported questionnaires from baseline to 13-18 months. Person-centered progressive resistance exercise was found to be a feasible mode of exercise for women with FM, improving muscle strength, health status, and current pain intensity when assessed immediately after the intervention. ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT01226784 , Oct 21, 2010.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 716 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 712 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 135 19%
Student > Master 81 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 6%
Student > Postgraduate 40 6%
Other 113 16%
Unknown 255 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 136 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 123 17%
Sports and Recreations 78 11%
Psychology 25 3%
Neuroscience 15 2%
Other 62 9%
Unknown 277 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2023.
All research outputs
#424,286
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#27
of 3,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,434
of 278,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.