| Title |
HMGB1 overexpression correlates with poor prognosis in early-stage squamous cervical cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-015-3624-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yirong Xu, Zhenwen Chen, Guangheng Zhang, Yanfeng Xi, Ruifang Sun, Fei Chai, Xiaogang Wang, Jianhong Guo, Lin Tian |
| Abstract |
High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is associated with tumor progression and a poor prognosis; microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) plays a critical role in autophagy. However, the roles of HMGB1 and LC3 in squamous cervical cancer (SCC) remain unclear. An array of 166 early-stage SCC, 62 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and 50 normal cervical tissue samples was assessed. HMGB1 and LC3 protein levels were examined by immunohistochemistry, and the associations of HMGB1 and LC3 levels with clinicopathological characteristics evaluated, to assess their prognosis significance. High nuclear HMGB1 levels were detected in 72.9 % SCC cases; 16 % cases showed cytoplasmic expression of HMGB1 in cancer cells with low nuclear expression. Interestingly, HMGB1 levels in SCC samples were significantly higher than CIN and control specimens, while lower LC3 expression was found in SCC samples (P < 0.001). Nuclear HMGB1 expression was weakly negatively correlated to LC3 amounts (r = -0.254, P = 0.001). High nuclear HMGB1 levels were associated with vascular metastasis (P < 0.05). In addition, cytoplasmic HMGB1 expression was associated with lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). Furthermore, high nuclear HMGB1 levels and cytoplasmic HMGB1 expression predicted poor overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Meanwhile, high LC3 expression was associated with favorable prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that both nuclear and cytoplasmic HMGB1 expressions were independent prognostic factors for overall- and disease-free survival, along with nodule metastasis. HMGB1 overexpression plays a significant role in SCC progression. Both nuclear and cytoplasmic HMGB1 are independent factors for poor prognosis in early-stage SCC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 27% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,280,315
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,834
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,174
of 264,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#103
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.