You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The ocean sampling day consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Giga Science, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13742-015-0066-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Kopf, Mesude Bicak, Renzo Kottmann, Julia Schnetzer, Ivaylo Kostadinov, Katja Lehmann, Antonio Fernandez-Guerra, Christian Jeanthon, Eyal Rahav, Matthias Ullrich, Antje Wichels, Gunnar Gerdts, Paraskevi Polymenakou, Giorgos Kotoulas, Rania Siam, Rehab Z Abdallah, Eva C Sonnenschein, Thierry Cariou, Fergal O’Gara, Stephen Jackson, Sandi Orlic, Michael Steinke, Julia Busch, Bernardo Duarte, Isabel Caçador, João Canning-Clode, Oleksandra Bobrova, Viggo Marteinsson, Eyjolfur Reynisson, Clara Magalhães Loureiro, Gian Marco Luna, Grazia Marina Quero, Carolin R Löscher, Anke Kremp, Marie E DeLorenzo, Lise Øvreås, Jennifer Tolman, Julie LaRoche, Antonella Penna, Marc Frischer, Timothy Davis, Barker Katherine, Christopher P Meyer, Sandra Ramos, Catarina Magalhães, Florence Jude-Lemeilleur, Ma Leopoldina Aguirre-Macedo, Shiao Wang, Nicole Poulton, Scott Jones, Rachel Collin, Jed A Fuhrman, Pascal Conan, Cecilia Alonso, Noga Stambler, Kelly Goodwin, Michael M Yakimov, Federico Baltar, Levente Bodrossy, Jodie Van De Kamp, Dion MF Frampton, Martin Ostrowski, Paul Van Ruth, Paul Malthouse, Simon Claus, Klaas Deneudt, Jonas Mortelmans, Sophie Pitois, David Wallom, Ian Salter, Rodrigo Costa, Declan C Schroeder, Mahrous M Kandil, Valentina Amaral, Florencia Biancalana, Rafael Santana, Maria Luiza Pedrotti, Takashi Yoshida, Hiroyuki Ogata, Tim Ingleton, Kate Munnik, Naiara Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, Veronique Berteaux-Lecellier, Patricia Wecker, Ibon Cancio, Daniel Vaulot, Christina Bienhold, Hassan Ghazal, Bouchra Chaouni, Soumya Essayeh, Sara Ettamimi, El Houcine Zaid, Noureddine Boukhatem, Abderrahim Bouali, Rajaa Chahboune, Said Barrijal, Mohammed Timinouni, Fatima El Otmani, Mohamed Bennani, Marianna Mea, Nadezhda Todorova, Ventzislav Karamfilov, Petra ten Hoopen, Guy Cochrane, Stephane L’Haridon, Kemal Can Bizsel, Alessandro Vezzi, Federico M Lauro, Patrick Martin, Rachelle M Jensen, Jamie Hinks, Susan Gebbels, Riccardo Rosselli, Fabio De Pascale, Riccardo Schiavon, Antonina dos Santos, Emilie Villar, Stéphane Pesant, Bruno Cataletto, Francesca Malfatti, Ranjith Edirisinghe, Jorge A Herrera Silveira, Michele Barbier, Valentina Turk, Tinkara Tinta, Wayne J Fuller, Ilkay Salihoglu, Nedime Serakinci, Mahmut Cerkez Ergoren, Eileen Bresnan, Juan Iriberri, Paul Anders Fronth Nyhus, Edvardsen Bente, Hans Erik Karlsen, Peter N Golyshin, Josep M Gasol, Snejana Moncheva, Nina Dzhembekova, Zackary Johnson, Christopher David Sinigalliano, Maribeth Louise Gidley, Adriana Zingone, Roberto Danovaro, George Tsiamis, Melody S Clark, Ana Cristina Costa, Monia El Bour, Ana M Martins, R Eric Collins, Anne-Lise Ducluzeau, Jonathan Martinez, Mark J Costello, Linda A Amaral-Zettler, Jack A Gilbert, Neil Davies, Dawn Field, Frank Oliver Glöckner |
| Abstract |
Ocean Sampling Day was initiated by the EU-funded Micro B3 (Marine Microbial Biodiversity, Bioinformatics, Biotechnology) project to obtain a snapshot of the marine microbial biodiversity and function of the world's oceans. It is a simultaneous global mega-sequencing campaign aiming to generate the largest standardized microbial data set in a single day. This will be achievable only through the coordinated efforts of an Ocean Sampling Day Consortium, supportive partnerships and networks between sites. This commentary outlines the establishment, function and aims of the Consortium and describes our vision for a sustainable study of marine microbial communities and their embedded functional traits. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Panama | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 58% |
| Scientists | 11 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 289 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 83 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 69 | 22% |
| Unknown | 47 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 96 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 53 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 48 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 57 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2018.
All research outputs
#965,216
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#132
of 1,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,203
of 279,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.