| Title |
Biolistic transformation of Trichoderma harzianum and Gliocladium virens using plasmid and genomic DNA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Genetics, October 1993
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00336788 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Lorito, C. K. Hayes, A. Di Pietro, G. E. Harman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 20% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,765,907
of 23,057,470 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetics
#121
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,425
of 20,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetics
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,057,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.