↓ Skip to main content

Identification of mammalian-like purple acid phosphatases in a wide range of plants

Overview of attention for article published in Gene, May 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of mammalian-like purple acid phosphatases in a wide range of plants
Published in
Gene, May 2000
DOI 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00186-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Schenk, L.W. Guddat, Y. Ge, L.E. Carrington, D.A. Hume, S. Hamilton, J. de Jersey

Abstract

Purple acid phosphatases (PAPs) comprise a family of binuclear metal-containing hydrolases, members of which have been isolated from plants, mammals and fungi. Polypeptide chains differ in size (animal approximately 35kDa, plant approximately 55kDa) and exhibit low sequence homology between kingdoms but all residues involved in co-ordination of the metal ions are invariant. A search of genomic databases was undertaken using a sequence pattern which includes the conserved residues. Several novel potential PAP sequences were detected, including the first known examples from bacterial sources. Ten plant ESTs were also identified which, although possessing the conserved sequence pattern, were not homologous throughout their sequences to previously known plant PAPs. Based on these EST sequences, novel cDNAs from sweet potato, soybean, red kidney bean and Arabidopsis thaliana were cloned and sequenced. These sequences are more closely related to mammalian PAP than to previously characterized plant enzymes. Their predicted secondary structure is similar to that of the mammalian enzyme. A model of the sweet potato enzyme was generated based on the coordinates of pig PAP. These observations strongly suggest that the cloned cDNA sequences represent a second group of plant PAPs with properties more similar to the mammalian enzymes than to the high molecular weight plant enzymes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Lecturer 6 8%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 20%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2008.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Gene
#3,257
of 10,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,798
of 40,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gene
#23
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.