↓ Skip to main content

Approaches to the economic evaluation of agroforestry farming systems

Overview of attention for article published in Agroforestry Systems, December 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Approaches to the economic evaluation of agroforestry farming systems
Published in
Agroforestry Systems, December 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf00155941
Authors

Dan M. Etherington, Peter J. Matthews

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
France 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 50%
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 39%
Environmental Science 3 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Agroforestry Systems
#268
of 1,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,568
of 35,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agroforestry Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,028 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them