↓ Skip to main content

Intracellular clusterin negatively regulates ovarian chemoresistance: compromised expression sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to paclitaxel

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Intracellular clusterin negatively regulates ovarian chemoresistance: compromised expression sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to paclitaxel
Published in
Tumor Biology, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13277-011-0207-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed Kamel Hassan, Hidemichi Watari, Lane Christenson, Saverio Bettuzzi, Noriaki Sakuragi

Abstract

Understanding the molecular events that lead to paclitaxel (TX) resistance is necessary to identify effective means to prevent chemoresistance. Previously, results from our lab revealed that secretory clusterin (CLU) form positively mediates TX response in ovarian cancer cells. Thus, we had interest to study the role of another non-secreted form (intracellular clusterin (i-CLU)) in chemo-response. Here, we provide evidences that i-CLU form localizes mainly in the nucleus and differentially expressed in the TX-responsive KF cells, versus TX-resistant, KF-TX, ovarian cancer cells and negatively regulate cellular chemo-response. I-CLU was cloned, by deleting the secretion-leading signaling peptide from full-length CLU cDNA, and transiently over-expressed in OVK-18 cells. Forced expression of truncated i-CLU was mainly detectable in the nuclei and significantly reduced cellular growth, accumulating cells in G1 phase which finally died through apoptosis. Importantly, compromised expression of i-CLU under an inducible promoter was tolerated and did not induce apoptosis but sensitized ovarian cancer cells to TX. We then demonstrated that this sensitization mechanism was cell cycle independent and relied on i-CLU/Ku70 binding probably due to controlling the free amount of Ku70 available for DNA repair in the nucleus. Results from CLU immunohistochemistry in ovarian tumor tissues verified the retardation of nuclear CLU staining in the recurrent tumor even though their primary counterparts showed nuclear CLU staining. Thus, the controversial data on CLU function in chemo-response/resistance may be explained by a shift in the pattern of CLU expression and intracellular localization as well when tumor acquires chemoresistance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 18%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,174,836
of 24,784,213 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#111
of 2,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,965
of 121,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,784,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,650 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.