↓ Skip to main content

Complications After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in 1573 Consecutive Patients: Are There Predictors?

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Complications After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in 1573 Consecutive Patients: Are There Predictors?
Published in
Obesity Surgery, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11695-015-1752-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Dayer-Jankechova, Pierre Fournier, Pierre Allemann, Michel Suter

Abstract

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), one of the commonest performed bariatric procedures, remains a technically challenging operation associated with significant morbidity in high-risk patients. This study was conducted in order to identify predictors of complications after laparoscopic RYGBP. Our prospectively established database has been assessed to review 30-day and in-hospital complications graded according to a validated scoring system (Clavien-Dindo) and separated into minor (Clavien-Dindo I-IIIa) and major (Clavien-Dindo IIIb-IV) complications. Patient- and procedure-related factors were analyzed using univariate analysis. Significant factors associated with morbidity were introduced into a multivariate analysis to identify independent predictors. Between 1999 and 2012, 1573 patients underwent laparoscopic RYGBP, 374 male and 1199 female. Mean age was 41 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 44.5 kg/m(2). One hundred fifty-nine procedures were reoperations. One hundred fifty (9.5 %) patients developed at least one complication, and 43 (2.7 %) had major complications, leading to death in one case (0.06 %). Risk factors for morbidity were male gender (p = 0.006) and overall experience of the team (p < 0.0001). Prolonged 3-day antibiotic therapy was associated with significantly reduced overall (p < 0.0001) and major (p = 0.005) complication rates. Major complications were associated with smoking (p = 0.016). The most significant individual risk factors for early complications after RYGBP are male gender, limited surgical experience, and single dose of antibiotics. RYGBP should be performed by experienced teams. Smoking should be discontinued before surgery. Prolonged antibiotic therapy could be considered, especially if a circular stapled gastrojejunostomy is performed with the anvil introduced transorally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 49%
Unspecified 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,416,517
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#2,536
of 3,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,482
of 266,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#28
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.