↓ Skip to main content

The prediction of virulence based on presence of virulence genes in E. coli may not always be accurate

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Pathogens, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
The prediction of virulence based on presence of virulence genes in E. coli may not always be accurate
Published in
Gut Pathogens, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13099-015-0062-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trudy M Wassenaar, Florian Gunzer

Abstract

Now that microbial whole genome sequencing is in reach of many researchers, it is common to infer virulent properties of a given bacterial isolate based on the presence of virulence genes. However, this may lead to inaccurate presumptions of virulence. Using the findings of a recent publication (Da Silva Santos et al. Gut Pathog 7:2, 2015) where virulence was inferred from a genome sequence and subsequently confirmed by in vitro analysis, we present an alternative view on the case described in that publication. Our alternative view point, which is further substantiated by whole genome sequencing of probiotic E. coli strains, may contribute to a more balanced vision on the interactions between pathogens and host.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
New Zealand 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Computer Science 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2015.
All research outputs
#5,394,723
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Gut Pathogens
#108
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,879
of 264,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Pathogens
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.