↓ Skip to main content

Rehabilitation and neuroplasticity in children with unilateral cerebral palsy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neurology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
420 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rehabilitation and neuroplasticity in children with unilateral cerebral palsy
Published in
Nature Reviews Neurology, June 2015
DOI 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.97
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee B. Reid, Stephen E. Rose, Roslyn N. Boyd

Abstract

Cerebral palsy is a childhood-onset, lifelong neurological disorder that primarily impairs motor function. Unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), which impairs use of one hand and perturbs bimanual co-ordination, is the most common form of the condition. The main contemporary upper limb rehabilitation strategies for UCP are constraint-induced movement therapy and bimanual intensive therapy. In this Review, we outline the factors that are crucial to the success of motor rehabilitation in children with UCP, including the dose of training, the relevance of training to daily life, the suitability of training to the age and goals of the child, and the ability of the child to maintain close attention to the tasks. Emerging evidence suggests that the first 2 years of life are a critical period during which interventions for UCP could be more effective than in later life. Abnormal brain organization in UCP, and the effects of development on rehabilitation, must also be understood to develop new effective interventions. Therefore, we also consider neuroimaging methods that can provide insight into the neurobiology of UCP and how the condition responds to existing therapies. We discuss how these methods could shape future rehabilitative strategies based on the neurobiology of UCP and the therapy-induced changes seen in the brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 412 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 16%
Student > Bachelor 54 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 11%
Researcher 32 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 74 18%
Unknown 120 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 81 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 64 15%
Neuroscience 38 9%
Engineering 25 6%
Psychology 21 5%
Other 47 11%
Unknown 144 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2015.
All research outputs
#3,205,592
of 25,064,526 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neurology
#784
of 2,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,635
of 244,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neurology
#21
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,064,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.