↓ Skip to main content

(日本哺乳類学会1996年度大会自由集会の記録),哺乳類にみられる新生子の晩成性と早成性

Overview of attention for article published in Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science), July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
(日本哺乳類学会1996年度大会自由集会の記録),哺乳類にみられる新生子の晩成性と早成性
Published in
Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science), July 2008
DOI 10.11238/mammalianscience.36.209
Authors

仲谷 淳, 川道 武男

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#21,048,638
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#329
of 353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,374
of 98,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#63
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 353 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.