Title |
The Effect of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Wharton’s Jelly in Spinal Cord Injury Treatment Is Dose-Dependent and Can Be Facilitated by Repeated Application
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.3390/ijms19051503 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Petr Krupa, Irena Vackova, Jiri Ruzicka, Kristyna Zaviskova, Jana Dubisova, Zuzana Koci, Karolina Turnovcova, Lucia Machova Urdzikova, Sarka Kubinova, Svatopluk Rehak, Pavla Jendelova |
Abstract |
Human mesenchymal stem cells derived from Wharton's jelly (WJ-MSCs) were used for the treatment of the ischemic-compression model of spinal cord injury in rats. To assess the effectivity of the treatment, different dosages (0.5 or 1.5 million cells) and repeated applications were compared. Cells or saline were applied intrathecally by lumbar puncture for one week only, or in three consecutive weeks after injury. Rats were assessed for locomotor skills (BBB, rotarod, flat beam) for 9 weeks. Spinal cord tissue was morphometrically analyzed for axonal sprouting, sparing of gray and white matter and astrogliosis. Endogenous gene expression (Gfap, Casp3, Irf5, Cd86, Mrc1, Cd163) was studied with quantitative Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT PCR). Significant recovery of functional outcome was observed in all of the treated groups except for the single application of the lowest number of cells. Histochemical analyses revealed a gradually increasing effect of grafted cells, resulting in a significant increase in the number of GAP43+ fibers, a higher amount of spared gray matter and reduced astrogliosis. mRNA expression of macrophage markers and apoptosis was downregulated after the repeated application of 1.5 million cells. We conclude that the effect of hWJ-MSCs on spinal cord regeneration is dose-dependent and potentiated by repeated application. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 29% |
Argentina | 2 | 14% |
France | 1 | 7% |
South Africa | 1 | 7% |
Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 29 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 21% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 31 | 43% |