↓ Skip to main content

Comparable effect of simulated side bending and side gliding positions on the direction and magnitude of lumbar disc hydration shift: in vivo MRI mechanistic study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy), December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparable effect of simulated side bending and side gliding positions on the direction and magnitude of lumbar disc hydration shift: in vivo MRI mechanistic study
Published in
Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy), December 2013
DOI 10.1179/2042618613y.0000000059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi Takasaki

Abstract

To investigate the direction and magnitude of mechanical influence to the lumbar disc in side bending and side gliding positions by considering shift of disc hydration. Twenty asymptomatic subjects completed this study. Direction of the hydration shift (θ), magnitude of the shift, and segmental lateral flexion and rotation angles from L1/L2 to L5/S1 during left side bend and side glide in lying were measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compared using paired t-tests. A significant difference (P<0.001) was detected in the segmental lateral flexion angle at L1/L2 between the side bending position (mean [SD], 5.1° [2.2°] left lateral flexion) and the side gliding position (mean [SD], 2.1° [2.7°] left lateral flexion). However, there was neither significant difference (P>0.05) in the lateral flexion angle at other segments nor rotation angles at each segment between the two lumbar positions. There was also no significant difference (P>0.05) in the θ value and magnitude of the hydration shift between the two lumbar positions. The disc hydration generally shifted to the right in the left side bending and side gliding positions at all disc levels. This is the first study to investigate mechanical influence to each lumbar disc in the side gliding position using the shift of disc hydration on axial MRI. The comparability in the direction and magnitude of the hydration shift in the side bending and side gliding positions indicates that the maneuver of side gliding can produce comparable ipsilateral mechanical influence to each lumbar disc in comparison to side bending.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 29%
Researcher 3 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 29%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,714,565
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy)
#317
of 599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,231
of 320,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy)
#46
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.