↓ Skip to main content

SOX 1, contrary to SOX 2, suppresses proliferation, migration, and invasion in human laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma by inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
SOX 1, contrary to SOX 2, suppresses proliferation, migration, and invasion in human laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma by inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway
Published in
Tumor Biology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-3389-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ning Yang, Yan Wang, Lian Hui, Xiaotian Li, Xuejun Jiang

Abstract

Sex-determining region Y (SRY)-box protein 1 (SOX 1) has been reported to have the inhibiting effects on various cancer cells; however, the expression and effect of SOX 1 on laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) have not been determined. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the anti-proliferation and metastatic effects of SOX 1 and its related mechanisms on LSCC. According to our present study, first, we found that overexpression of SOX 1 could significantly inhibit proliferation and promote apoptosis in Tu212 cells. Additionally, overexpression of SOX 1 suppressed the migration and invasion potential of Tu212 cells via regulating Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Finally, we demonstrated for the first time that overexpression of SOX 1 could downregulate the expression of SOX 2, and co-expression of SOX 1 and SOX 2 could reverse the anti-tumor effect of SOX 1. In conclusion, our studies suggested that SOX 1 suppressed cell growth and invasion in Tu212 cells by inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and the anti-tumor effect of SOX 1 could be weakened by SOX 2, which may be a potential molecular basis for clinical treatment of LSCC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,416,517
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,369
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,793
of 267,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#65
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.