↓ Skip to main content

Functional Divergence in the Glutathione Transferase Superfamily in Plants IDENTIFICATION OF TWO CLASSES WITH PUTATIVE FUNCTIONS IN REDOX HOMEOSTASIS IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA *

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
355 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional Divergence in the Glutathione Transferase Superfamily in Plants IDENTIFICATION OF TWO CLASSES WITH PUTATIVE FUNCTIONS IN REDOX HOMEOSTASIS IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA *
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, June 2002
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m202919200
Pubmed ID
Authors

David P. Dixon, Benjamin G. Davis, Robert Edwards

Abstract

Searches with the human Omega glutathione transferase (GST) identified two outlying groups of the GST superfamily in Arabidopsis thaliana which differed from all other plant GSTs by containing a cysteine in place of a serine at the active site. One group consisted of four genes, three of which encoded active glutathione-dependent dehydroascorbate reductases (DHARs). Two DHARs were predicted to be cytosolic, whereas the other contained a chloroplast targeting peptide. The DHARs were also active as thiol transferases but had no glutathione conjugating activity. Unlike most other GSTs, DHARs were monomeric. The other class of GST comprised two genes termed the Lambda GSTs (GSTLs). The recombinant GSTLs were also monomeric and had glutathione-dependent thiol transferase activity. One GSTL was cytosolic, whereas the other was chloroplast-targeted. When incubated with oxidized glutathione, the putative active site cysteine of the GSTLs and cytosolic DHARs formed mixed disulfides with glutathione, whereas the plastidic DHAR formed an intramolecular disulfide. DHAR S-glutathionylation was consistent with a proposed catalytic mechanism for dehydroascorbate reduction. Roles for the cytosolic DHARs and GSTLs as antioxidant enzymes were also inferred from the induction of the respective genes following exposure to chemicals and oxidative stress.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 149 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 24%
Researcher 34 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Master 10 6%
Professor 6 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 37 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 15%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Chemistry 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 43 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#32,956
of 85,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,940
of 48,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#407
of 919 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 919 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.