↓ Skip to main content

Defects in Carbon-Rich Ferrite of Cold-Drawn Pearlitic Steel Wires

Overview of attention for article published in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Defects in Carbon-Rich Ferrite of Cold-Drawn Pearlitic Steel Wires
Published in
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11661-013-1723-x
Authors

Y. Z. Chen, G. Csiszár, J. Cizek, S. Westerkamp, C. Borchers, T. Ungár, S. Goto, F. Liu, R. Kirchheim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 16%
Researcher 5 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 19 61%
Unspecified 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
#157
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,791
of 202,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.