| Title |
Learning how to learn: The significance and current status of learning set formation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Primates, January 1984
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02382299 |
| Authors |
Allan M. Schrier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 29% |
| Psychology | 11 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,836,890
of 23,057,470 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#258
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,032
of 35,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,057,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them