↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic trees as search trees via euler tours, applied to the network simplex algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in Mathematical Programming, August 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Dynamic trees as search trees via euler tours, applied to the network simplex algorithm
Published in
Mathematical Programming, August 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf02614369
Authors

Robert E. Tarjan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 10%
Japan 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 17 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 43%
Researcher 3 14%
Unspecified 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 38%
Mathematics 4 19%
Unspecified 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Decision Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,462,180
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Mathematical Programming
#145
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,272
of 29,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematical Programming
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them