↓ Skip to main content

Learning to plan for constrained manipulation from demonstrations

Overview of attention for article published in Autonomous Robots, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Learning to plan for constrained manipulation from demonstrations
Published in
Autonomous Robots, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10514-015-9440-5
Authors

Mike Phillips, Victor Hwang, Sachin Chitta, Maxim Likhachev

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 96 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 44%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 44 44%
Computer Science 35 35%
Unspecified 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,763,547
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Autonomous Robots
#392
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,287
of 264,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autonomous Robots
#25
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.