↓ Skip to main content

The use of a flow field correction technique for alleviating the North Atlantic cold bias with application to the Kiel Climate Model

Overview of attention for article published in Ocean Dynamics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
The use of a flow field correction technique for alleviating the North Atlantic cold bias with application to the Kiel Climate Model
Published in
Ocean Dynamics, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10236-015-0853-7
Authors

Annika Drews, Richard J. Greatbatch, Hui Ding, Mojib Latif, Wonsun Park

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 7%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 60%
Environmental Science 4 13%
Unspecified 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,280,315
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Ocean Dynamics
#352
of 962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,229
of 264,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ocean Dynamics
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 962 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.