↓ Skip to main content

Specific cation effect in the reaction of nitroprusside with cysteine, acetophenone and sulfite (Legal and boedeker reaction)

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, October 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Specific cation effect in the reaction of nitroprusside with cysteine, acetophenone and sulfite (Legal and boedeker reaction)
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, October 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf01999942
Pubmed ID
Authors

O. R. Leeuwenkamp, C. H. Vermaat, C. M. Plug, A. Bult

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 60%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2000.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#632
of 1,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,504
of 8,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them