↓ Skip to main content

Fine-scale topography in sensory systems: insights from Drosophila and vertebrates

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Fine-scale topography in sensory systems: insights from Drosophila and vertebrates
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00359-015-1022-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takuya Kaneko, Bing Ye

Abstract

To encode the positions of sensory stimuli, sensory circuits form topographic maps in the central nervous system through specific point-to-point connections between pre- and postsynaptic neurons. In vertebrate visual systems, the establishment of topographic maps involves the formation of a coarse topography followed by that of fine-scale topography that distinguishes the axon terminals of neighboring neurons. It is known that intrinsic differences in the form of broad gradients of guidance molecules instruct coarse topography while neuronal activity is required for fine-scale topography. On the other hand, studies in the Drosophila visual system have shown that intrinsic differences in cell adhesion among the axon terminals of neighboring neurons instruct the fine-scale topography. Recent studies on activity-dependent topography in the Drosophila somatosensory system have revealed a role of neuronal activity in creating molecular differences among sensory neurons for establishing fine-scale topography, implicating a conserved principle. Here we review the findings in both Drosophila and vertebrates and propose an integrated model for fine-scale topography.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 34%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 45%
Neuroscience 9 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2015.
All research outputs
#14,065,859
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#962
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,951
of 265,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.