↓ Skip to main content

Reflections on the 2008 AECT Definitions of the Field

Overview of attention for article published in TechTrends, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Reflections on the 2008 AECT Definitions of the Field
Published in
TechTrends, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11528-008-0108-2
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Canada 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 175 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 55 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 52 28%
Computer Science 18 10%
Arts and Humanities 13 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Linguistics 5 3%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 63 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from TechTrends
#300
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,647
of 82,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from TechTrends
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them